Every investment decision at KSINQ is built on tested ideas — refined by decades of practice and adapted for cross-border application. This is the intellectual architecture behind everything we do.
KSINQ 的每一个投资决策都建立在经过检验的思想之上——数十年实践打磨，并为跨境应用做了适配。这是我们所有工作背后的认知架构。
Second-level thinking and the discipline of cycles. Why being right isn't enough — you must be right in a way that differs from consensus.第二层思维与周期的纪律。为什么正确还不够——你必须以不同于共识的方式正确。
Read more →阅读更多 →Antifragility, fat tails, and skin in the game. Building portfolios that gain from disorder rather than merely surviving it.反脆弱、肥尾分布与风险共担。构建在混乱中获益而非仅仅存活的投资组合。
Read more →阅读更多 →Falsification as investment discipline. Every thesis must define what would prove it wrong before it earns capital.证伪作为投资纪律。每个论点在获得资金之前必须定义什么能证明它是错的。
Read more →阅读更多 →Reflexivity — how market participants' beliefs change the fundamentals they're trying to predict.反身性——市场参与者的信念如何改变他们试图预测的基本面。
Coming soon即将上线Mental models and multidisciplinary thinking. Avoiding cognitive biases through structured decision-making.多元思维模型和跨学科思考。通过结构化决策避免认知偏差。
Coming soon即将上线Howard MarksThe complete second-level thinking framework for investors.投资者完整的第二层思维框架。
Read annotation →阅读评注 →Nassim TalebSystems that gain from disorder — applied to portfolio construction.从混乱中获益的系统——应用于投资组合构建。
Read annotation →阅读评注 →Karl PopperThe scientific method as investment discipline.科学方法作为投资纪律。
Read annotation →阅读评注 →Buy-side researcher + Risk manager + Trader. Three independent lenses stress-test every thesis before capital moves.买方研究员 + 风险管理者 + 交易员。三个独立视角在资金行动前压力测试每个论点。
Read more →阅读更多 →Designing portfolios and research processes that gain from volatility and uncertainty.设计在波动和不确定性中获益的投资组合与研究流程。
Read more →阅读更多 →Every thesis defines its own kill criteria. What would prove us wrong? The answer shapes position sizing and stop-losses.每个论点定义自己的失效标准。什么能证明我们是错的？答案决定仓位和止损。
Read more →阅读更多 →